Towards Integrating the Principlist and Casuist Approaches to Ethical Decisions via Multi-Criterial Support
نویسندگان
چکیده
An interactive decision support tool based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) can help health professionals integrate the principlist (principle-based) and casuist (case-based) approaches to ethical decision making in both their training and practice. MCDA can incorporate generic ethical principles as criteria; then draw on case-based reasoning as the basis for specifying, in the individual case, the available options, the ratings of each option on each criterion, and the relative weighting of the criteria. This produces a personalised, transparent and decomposable opinion on the merits of each option, as a contribution to enhanced deliberation. As proof of concept and method an exemplar aid adds veracity and confidentiality to beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice, as the criteria, with case-based reasoning supplying the necessary inputs for the decision of whether a nurse should disclose the poor prognosis of a patient to a close relative of the patient, when asked, on their first encounter.
منابع مشابه
Casuist BDI-Agent: A New Extended BDI Architecture with the Capability of Ethical Reasoning
Since the intelligent agent is developed to be cleverer, more complex, and yet uncontrollable, a number of problems have been recognized. The capability of agents to make moral decisions has become important question, when intelligent agents have developed more autonomous and human-like. In this paper we propose Casuist BDI-Agent architecture which extends the power of BDI architecture. Casuist...
متن کاملPnm-10: Towards Integrating The Traditional Medicine with Modern Medical Approaches in Infertility
Background ART is costly for governments and couples seeking treatment. In addition to any other costs that may arise during treatment, such as medication, consultations and extra procedures, women undergoing IVF experience physical and emotional stress. Furthermore, it is not always possible to get a favorable outcome. Despite all the remarkable scientific advances in modern medicine, traditio...
متن کاملPrioritising, Ranking and Resource Implementation - A Normative Analysis
Background Priority setting in publicly financed healthcare systems should be guided by ethical norms and other considerations viewed as socially valuable, and we find several different approaches for how such norms and considerations guide priorities in healthcare decision-making. Common to many of these approaches is that interventions are ranked in relation to each other, following the appli...
متن کاملRelationship between of Ethical Approaches and Ethical Behavior in the Accounting Profession: The Trevino’s Developed Model
Background: Accountantschr('39') ethical decisions vary depending on the nature and scope of the ethical approaches involved in the conduct. The aim of this research is to investigate impact of ethical approaches of the Trevino’s developed model on the ethical behavior of accountants. Method: The present research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of data collection, is a descriptive ...
متن کاملMedical ethics and the Romanian law. Surrogate decisions regarding life-saving medical interventions
Romanian doctors who encounter controversial surrogate decisions such as refusal of life-saving interventions react differently from an ethical perspective. Some do not take into account the surrogates' rejection of treatment, while others respect and abide by the surrogates' decision and withhold the refused procedures, forgoing their ethical responsibilities. In this article we will defend th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Studies in health technology and informatics
دوره 225 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016